Monthly Archives: May 2006

The H-Prize: The ultimate in competitive science

The H-Prize takes its shape and name from the privately funded $10 million Ansari X Prize, which led, in 2004, to the first privately developed manned rocket to reach outer space twice. Members of the House Science Committee said that … Continue reading

Posted in Science | 1 Comment

Academic papers in Open Access journals receive better recognition

Here’s the abstract of the paper by Gunther Eysenbach. Open access (OA) to the research literature has the potential to accelerate recognition and dissemination of research findings, but its actual effects are controversial. This was a longitudinal bibliometric analysis of … Continue reading

Posted in Publish/Perish, Science | Leave a comment

On Roman myths and barbarians

It has been easy to underestimate Celtic technological achievements because so much has vanished or been misunderstood. Of course, it was thoughtless of the Celts not to leave us anything much in the way of written records — they should … Continue reading

Posted in History | Leave a comment

Fryer and Levitt on “Racial differences in the mental ability of young children”

Roland G. Fryer and Steven D. Levitt (2006): Testing for racial differences in the mental ability of young children. Here is the abstract: On tests of intelligence, Blacks systematically score worse than Whites, whereas Asians frequently outperform Whites. Some have … Continue reading

Posted in Social Science | 1 Comment

Faked research on computer chip design

Here is the NYTimes story that broke the news. The quote below is from the follow-up story: [A] top computer scientist, Chen Jin, … became a national hero in 2003 when he said he had created one of China’s first … Continue reading

Posted in Ethics | Leave a comment

Can economic models ‘prove’ anything?

This has something to do with the little ‘just-so’ theory I indulged myself in yesterday. Though my intention was totally non-serious (but not frivolous!), one still has to wonder if serious economic models can ever be said to ‘prove’ something … Continue reading

Posted in Economics, Social Science | Leave a comment

It’s financial impropriety now

The aftermath of Hwang Woo Suk scandal has taken yet another bizarre turn. He has now been accused of financial impropriety too! Prosecutors on Friday indicted a disgraced cloning scientist on embezzlement and bioethics law violations linked to faked stem … Continue reading

Posted in Ethics | Leave a comment

John Kenneth Galbraith

Two links: The first, to a profile in Guardian, is from several years ago. The second, to a NYTimes op-ed by Robert H. Frank, goes into some of the possible reasons for why he didn’t get the Nobel. * * … Continue reading

Posted in Economics, Social Science | Leave a comment

Quotas are economically efficient!

Alternate title: “Fun and Frolic on the Beaches of the Just-So Land” (from the Annals of Just-So Theories, May 2006) Introduction: In this paper, we propose a simple (heck, it’s even simplistic!) model to show that quotas are economically efficient. … Continue reading

Posted in Controversy | 8 Comments

Death of the industrial research lab

Basic research performed in industrial laboratories is declining — is the focus on profitability to the detriment of furthering scientific knowledge? Do read this interesting article by A. Michael Noll (Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California) in Nature … Continue reading

Posted in Science, Society | 1 Comment

Is the peer review system broken?

The New York Times ran an article yesterday with the following opening: Recent disclosures of fraudulent or flawed studies in medical and scientific journals have called into question as never before the merits of their peer-review system. The system is … Continue reading

Posted in Ethics | 1 Comment

Is the peer review system broken?

The New York Times ran an article yesterday with the following opening: Recent disclosures of fraudulent or flawed studies in medical and scientific journals have called into question as never before the merits of their peer-review system. The system is … Continue reading

Posted in Ethics | Leave a comment